As of 22 April 2009 this website is 'frozen' in time — see the current IFLA websites
This old website and all of its content will stay on as archive – http://archive.ifla.org
Some time before the computer era really got started the first Dutch professor of librarianship Loos-jes defined docu-mentary infor-mation as 'know-ledge in motion', mea-ning the conti-nuing pro-cess of reading and research-ing, theori-sing and pu-blishing, catalo-guing and making availa-ble, reading and re-searching etc. Despite the fact that a lot of documentary information has lost its docu-mentary aspect, and has become more volatile, and despite the fact that the motion has increased in pace, the underly-ing thought is valid still. And has been valid for a long time: lots of things we consider new were thought of long before the tools to realize them were there. In "Le diverse et arti-ficio-se machine del capitano Agostino Ramelli," publis-hed in Paris in the sixteenth century, we see a renais-sance versi-on of Windows, Windows 1558 to be precise. The reader, sitting at the revol-ving bookmachine, can get simulta-neous access to twelve books, not by using a mouse, but, much more efficient, by using footpedals.
The role of the librarian, by whiche-ver name we care to name him, will always be, has to be, that of a pilot steering people towards that bit or byte of information they seek.
Nevertheless, big changes are taking place of course, and in the follo-wing speech I will try to give you an impression of the chan-ging field of art historical librarianship in the Netherlands.
In the beginning of the seventies the university libraries and the Royal Library felt the need to cut down costs of catalo-guing and developed a computer system in which shared catalo-guing played a central role. PICA is the face of library automa-tion in the Netherlands as far as the universi-ties and the Royal Library are concer-ned. PICA (Centre for Library Automa-tizati-on) and the Royal Library are respon-sible for the NCC, the Dutch Union Catalogu-e, and the NCC/P, the Dutch Union Catalo-gue of Perio-dicals.
Nevertheless there is a large number of libra-ries, that do not take part in PICA and the NCC. The reason is that for smaller and speciali-zed libraries PICA is often very expensi-ve, and, being a very large system and a big organiza-tion, flexibility is not the first word I have in mind when I think of descri-bing its attitude towards everything non-PICA.
The number of volumes of art histo-rical publi-cations of libra-ries that do partake in PICA is not easily distilled since part of this literature is embedded in larger collec-tions, but an optimis-tic guess would be between 450,000 and 600,000. The non-PICA-libraries own 1,845,000 volumes between them. In both cases I'm talking volumes, not titles.
The libra-ries of the RKD, The Rijksmu-seum, The Stedelijk Museum and the Museum Boijmans, together good for a million books, all cata-loguing with the same, non-PICA system, i.e. TINLIB, wanted to produce a joint database, offering the whole to the NCC, and thus filling a blank space. All four libra-ri-ans of these instituti-ons had expected that the big-gest part of these collections would prove to overlap. To our great surprise 60% of the titles proved to be unique, available at just one of these four libra-ries. Thus making a joint catalo-gue more difficult and more interesting at the same time. The idea of an on-line database with possi-bilities for shared catalo-guing proved too expensi-ve, but a CD-ROM listing these four collections is in produc-tion. It is the intention that the smaller TINLIB libra-ries will in the future be included in this project, so that a better overview of the whole of the art historical literature present in the Netherlands will be available within a few years.
All art libraries now participate in the OKBN, an acronym standing for Overleg Kunsthistorische Bibliotheken Nederland, the Art Libraries Society. In 1982 eight librarians of art historical libraries began holding informal meetings to ex-change ideas and opinions and profit from each others' expe-rience. The style of these meetings is still informal, but for practical reasons, the debating club became a registered association in 1996. Nowadays the meetings are generally attended by some thirty to forty librarians. In 1996 the OKBN produced a valuable guide to art historical and related libra-ry collections in the Netherlands, called 'Collections of art-historical documentation in the Netherlands'.
Recent initiatives to create local library networks give access to various collections. Amsterdamnet and Rotterdamnet for instance, create the possibility to search through all Amsterdam or Rotterdam library collections: public, university and special libraries in one system.
A second reason for a growing number of potential clients is the increase in postgraduate research. In the Nether-lands there has grown a rather wide cleft between those art histori-ans who work in a museum and those who work at the universi-ties. The latter group has the tenden-cy to do theore-tical research, the former is busy with the more practical aspects of the trade. This situation is not, as for instance in Fran-ce, caused by different educational training, but the result of an extreme low job mobility, so that there are not many people who make the trans-fer from universi-ty to museum and vice versa. This situa-tion was seen to be far from ideal, both by the museums and the universities. This was one of the reasons for establishing the Onderzoekschool Kunstge-schiede-nis (Dutch postgraduate School for Art History) in 1994, in which universities and museums collaborate, giving postgraduate stu-dents the chance to do re-search in the museums too.
The collection of the library is varied and contains more than 70,000 exhibition catalogues, 30,000 monographs and 20,000 collection catalogues. There is a small but interesting col-lection of emblem books and old imprints, but the most special collection is the one on surrealism. Since the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen is the only museum in the Netherlands with a collection of surrealism the library has for twenty years now collected in this area. This includes not only exhibition catalogues and monographs, but also the source materials. The emphasis lies on the books and periodicals published between 1920 and 1950. La révolution surréalis-te, Minotaure, Docu-ments, Variétés, London bulletin are just five magazines of the more than hundred that appeared in the interbellum. Of these periodicals almost none is present in Dutch library collections. Checking the NCC Periodicals one finds few of the originals, some reprints, and then mostly scattered over different libraries all over the country. Museum Boijmans can proudly state that it has a central re-search collection in this field. Of course much larger collec-tions exist abroad, for instance in Brussels and Paris, and in Chicago. At the moment we are trying to find a special budget for this catego-ry of books which can still be found at not too unreaso-nable prices.
The book collection is not only used in a documentary fashion. Boijmans is a varied museum, with modern and old art and decorative art. The museum tries to make integrated exhibiti-ons: when for instan-ce the Moroc-can photographs of the Ameri-can writer Paul Bowles were shown, the library put together an exhibition of books of artists' travels in Morocco, of old guidebooks and maps, all from the own collection.
This fabulous library deserves much more attention and visi-tors than it gets at the moment. And our ambition is to make this unknown, hidden treasure known, to change this inwards orientated library to a library that is not so much a public library as a library open to all people who are interested in art and art history. The four pillars on which this programme is founded are: the collection, the building, automation, and staff. Five years ago we had just the collection. No adequate staff, no computer, a reading room with a few rickety chairs, some dusty cellars bursting with books, the collection divided over six locations within the museum.
One by one the problems are being solved. We have managed to obtain a grant of 250,000 guilders to catalogue the whole collection retrospectively. This project is now being underta-ken by a firm specialized in this field. The collection is still being expanded in the same way as before, and here we are searching for extra means to extend the special collection on surrealism. The housing problem will be over when the new extension of the museum will open its doors, and the staffing problem? Well, when two out of three major problems prove solvable within five years, this last obstruc-tion to a real new library functioning in a new way will surely be overco-me.